"drowned by" vs "was drowned by"

Question

"drowned by" vs "was drowned by"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Was drowned by" is the passive voice construction, where the subject receives the action of drowning. On the other hand, "drowned by" is the active voice construction, where the subject performs the action of drowning. The choice between them depends on whether you want to emphasize the subject or the action in the sentence.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used in active voice constructions to indicate that the subject performed the action of drowning.

Examples:

He drowned by pulling the person to safety.
The company drowned by investing in risky ventures.

Alternatives:

drowned while
drowned after
drowned because of
drowned due to
drowned in

This phrase is used in passive voice constructions to indicate that the subject received the action of drowning.

Examples:

He was drowned by the weight of his heavy backpack.
The ship was drowned by the massive waves during the storm.

Alternatives:

was submerged by
was overwhelmed by
was engulfed by
was inundated by
was swamped by

Answer 1

drowned by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in active voice constructions.

Answer 2

was drowned by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in passive voice constructions.

"drowned by" vs "was drowned by"

drowned by

was drowned by

Related Comparisons