"was replaced by" vs "was replaced with"

Question

"was replaced by" vs "was replaced with"

Both "was replaced with" and "was replaced by" are correct phrases in English, but they are used in different contexts. "Was replaced with" is used when specifying the new item or person that took the place of the old one, while "was replaced by" is used when indicating the action of substitution or the agent responsible for the replacement.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the action of substitution or the agent responsible for the replacement. For example, "The old system was replaced by a new one."

Examples:

The old system was replaced by a new one.
The injured player was replaced by a substitute.
The old manager was replaced by a new one.
The outdated technology was replaced by modern equipment.
The old policy was replaced by a new one.

Alternatives:

was substituted by
was exchanged by
was swapped by
was changed by
was traded by

This phrase is used to indicate the new item or person that replaced the old one. For example, "The broken window was replaced with a new one."

Examples:

The old furniture was replaced with modern pieces.
The traditional recipe was replaced with a healthier version.
The outdated software was replaced with a more efficient program.
The damaged part was replaced with a new one.
The old logo was replaced with a new design.

Alternatives:

was substituted with
was exchanged with
was swapped with
was changed with
was traded with

Answer 1

was replaced by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when indicating the action of substitution or the agent responsible for the replacement.

Answer 2

was replaced with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when specifying the new item or person that took the place of the old one.

"was replaced by" vs "was replaced with"

was replaced by

was replaced with

Related Comparisons