"was overpowered by" vs "overpowered by power of"

Question

"was overpowered by" vs "overpowered by power of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Was overpowered by' is a common expression used to indicate being overwhelmed or defeated by someone or something. On the other hand, 'overpowered by power of' is less common and may sound redundant, as 'power' is already implied in 'overpowered.'

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate being overwhelmed or defeated by someone or something.

Examples:

He was overpowered by the strength of his opponent.
She was overpowered by the emotions of the moment.

Alternatives:

was overwhelmed by
was defeated by
was unable to resist
was dominated by
was crushed by

This phrase may sound redundant as 'power' is already implied in 'overpowered.' It can be used for emphasis or in specific contexts where the repetition of 'power' is intentional.

Examples:

She was overpowered by the sheer power of his argument.
The team was overpowered by the power of nature.

Alternatives:

overwhelmed by the power of
defeated by the power of
unable to resist the power of
dominated by the power of
crushed by the power of

Answer 1

was overpowered by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

overpowered by power of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"was overpowered by" vs "overpowered by power of"

was overpowered by

overpowered by power of

Related Comparisons