"was overpowered by" vs "overpowered by the power of"

Question

"was overpowered by" vs "overpowered by the power of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Was overpowered by' is a more concise and common way to express being overwhelmed or defeated by something, while 'overpowered by the power of' adds emphasis by specifying the source of the overwhelming force. The choice between them depends on the level of detail and emphasis you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone or something was overwhelmed or defeated by a force, emotion, or situation.

Examples:

He was overpowered by the strength of his opponent.
She was overpowered by the emotions of the moment.
The team was overpowered by the sheer number of their opponents.

Alternatives:

was overwhelmed by
was defeated by
was unable to resist
was dominated by
was crushed by

This phrase is used to emphasize that someone or something was overwhelmed by the specific power or strength of a force, emotion, or situation.

Examples:

She was overpowered by the power of her own emotions.
The village was overpowered by the power of the storm.
He was overpowered by the power of his opponent's arguments.

Alternatives:

was overwhelmed by the power of
was defeated by the power of
was unable to resist the power of
was dominated by the power of
was crushed by the power of

Answer 1

was overpowered by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express being overwhelmed or defeated by something.

Answer 2

overpowered by the power of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English. It adds emphasis by specifying the source of the overwhelming force.

"was overpowered by" vs "overpowered by the power of"

was overpowered by

overpowered by the power of

Related Comparisons