"to the size of" vs "to size of"

Question

"to the size of" vs "to size of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'To the size of' is used when comparing the size of two things, while 'to size of' is used when referring to the size of something without a specific comparison. They are not interchangeable.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

Use 'to the size of' when you want to compare the size of one thing to another. It indicates a specific comparison between sizes.

Examples:

The new house is tiny compared to the size of the old mansion.
She bought a dress that was similar to the size of her friend's.
The dog was huge compared to the size of the cat.
The project was ambitious, almost equal to the size of the previous one.
The cake was enormous, close to the size of the table.

Alternatives:

as big as
similar in size to
almost the same size as
comparable in size to
nearly the size of

Use 'to size of' when you want to talk about the size of something without directly comparing it to another size. It is a more general statement about size.

Examples:

The room was spacious, similar to size of the living room.
The car was compact, close to size of a sedan.
The bookshelf was large, almost equal to size of the wall.
The garden was vast, comparable to size of a park.
The computer was small, nearly the size of a tablet.

Alternatives:

of similar size to
approximately the size of
about the size of
roughly the size of
around the size of

Answer 1

to the size of

This phrase is correct and commonly used when comparing the size of two things.

Answer 2

to size of

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the size of something without a specific comparison.

"to the size of" vs "to size of"

to the size of

to size of

Related Comparisons