"proportional to the size of" vs "proportional to size of"

Question

"proportional to the size of" vs "proportional to size of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Proportional to the size of" is more commonly used when referring to a specific object or entity, while "proportional to size of" is more general and can be used in a broader sense.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to a specific object or entity whose size is being compared to something else. It indicates a direct relationship between the size of the object and another variable.

Examples:

The cost of the project is proportional to the size of the team.
The amount of paint needed is proportional to the size of the wall.

Alternatives:

directly proportional to the size of
in direct proportion to the size of
correlated with the size of

This phrase is more general and can be used in a broader sense when discussing relationships that involve size without specifying a particular object or entity.

Examples:

The level of difficulty is proportional to size of the task.
The time required is proportional to size of the project.

Alternatives:

proportional to the size of
proportional to the magnitude of
proportional to the scale of

Answer 1

proportional to the size of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

proportional to size of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"proportional to the size of" vs "proportional to size of"

proportional to the size of

proportional to size of

Related Comparisons