"to size of" vs "and is inverse proportional"

Question

"to size of" vs "and is inverse proportional"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "To size of" is incorrect and should be replaced with "to the size of." On the other hand, "and is inversely proportional" is a correct phrase used to describe a relationship between two variables.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

The correct phrase is "to the size of," which is used to compare something to the extent or magnitude of a particular size.

Alternatives:

to the size of

"And is inversely proportional" is used to indicate that two variables have an inverse relationship, meaning when one variable increases, the other decreases.

Answer 1

to size of

This phrase is incorrect. It should be "to the size of."

Answer 2

and is inverse proportional

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe a relationship where one variable decreases as the other variable increases.

"to size of" vs "and is inverse proportional"

to size of

and is inverse proportional

Related Comparisons