"were documented" vs "were documented as"

Question

"were documented" vs "were documented as"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Were documented as' is used when specifying the manner or form in which something was documented, while 'were documented' is a more general statement indicating that something was recorded or written down.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is a more general statement indicating that something was documented. It does not provide specific details about how the documentation was done.

Examples:

The historical events were documented for future generations.
The research findings were documented in a detailed report.
The changes in policy were documented in the official records.

Alternatives:

were recorded
were noted
were written down
were detailed
were chronicled

This phrase is used to indicate the specific way in which something was recorded or written down. It adds detail to the act of documentation.

Examples:

The findings were documented as a series of case studies.
The events were documented as they unfolded.
The changes were documented as part of the research process.

Alternatives:

were recorded as
were described as
were noted as
were written down as
were detailed as

Answer 1

were documented

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something was recorded or written down without specifying the manner or form of documentation.

Answer 2

were documented as

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to specify the manner or form in which something was documented.

"were documented" vs "were documented as"

were documented

were documented as

Related Comparisons