"was acknowledged" vs "was acknowledged as"

Question

"was acknowledged" vs "was acknowledged as"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Was acknowledged' is used when simply stating that something was recognized or accepted, while 'was acknowledged as' is used when specifying what something was recognized or accepted as.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used when stating that something was recognized or accepted without specifying further details.

Examples:

Her hard work was acknowledged by the entire team.
The importance of the project was acknowledged by the management.
His talent was acknowledged by many in the industry.

Alternatives:

was recognized
was accepted
was appreciated

This phrase is used when specifying what something was recognized or accepted as.

Examples:

She was acknowledged as the best student in the class.
The painting was acknowledged as a masterpiece by art critics.
He was acknowledged as a leader in the field.

Alternatives:

was recognized as
was accepted as
was appreciated as

Answer 1

was acknowledged

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

was acknowledged as

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"was acknowledged" vs "was acknowledged as"

was acknowledged

was acknowledged as

Related Comparisons