"were regarded as" vs "which can be seen also as"

Question

"were regarded as" vs "which can be seen also as"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Were regarded as' is used to express how something was perceived or considered in the past, while 'which can be seen also as' is used to introduce an alternative interpretation or perspective. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate how something was viewed or considered by others in the past. It is often used to describe opinions or judgments made about a particular subject.

Examples:

The artist's early works were regarded as groundbreaking at the time.
Her efforts were regarded as instrumental in the success of the project.

Alternatives:

were seen as
were considered as
were thought of as
were viewed as
were looked upon as

This phrase is used to suggest that there is another way to perceive or understand something. It is often used to present a different viewpoint or to offer an additional perspective.

Examples:

The decision to cut costs can be seen also as a way to increase efficiency.
His behavior can be seen also as a cry for help.

Alternatives:

can also be interpreted as
can also be viewed as
can also be considered as
can also be perceived as
can also be understood as

Answer 1

were regarded as

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express how something was perceived or considered in the past.

Answer 2

which can be seen also as

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English. It is used to introduce an alternative interpretation or perspective on a particular matter.

"were regarded as" vs "which can be seen also as"

were regarded as

which can be seen also as

Related Comparisons