"were regarded as" vs "which can be seen also"

Question

"were regarded as" vs "which can be seen also"

The phrases "were regarded as" and "which can be seen also" are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "Were regarded as" is used to express how something was perceived or considered in the past, while "which can be seen also" is more descriptive and indicates that something is visible or noticeable. Therefore, they are not interchangeable in most contexts.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

Use "were regarded as" to express how something or someone was viewed or thought of by others in the past.

Examples:

The company's policies were regarded as outdated by many employees.
She was regarded as a pioneer in the field of science.

Alternatives:

were seen as
were considered as
were thought of as
were viewed as
were looked upon as

Alternatives:

which can also be seen
which is also visible
which is noticeable as well
which can also be observed
which is also apparent

Answer 1

were regarded as

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate how something was perceived or considered in the past.

Answer 2

which can be seen also

This phrase is not commonly used in English. It sounds awkward and unclear. A more natural way to express visibility or noticeability would be to use a different construction.

"were regarded as" vs "which can be seen also"

were regarded as

which can be seen also

Related Comparisons