"proportional to size of" vs "the more likely symbol"

Question

"proportional to size of" vs "the more likely symbol"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. 'Proportional to size of' is used to indicate a relationship between two quantities, while 'the more likely symbol' is used to refer to a specific symbol that is more probable in a given context.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to express that one quantity changes in relation to the size of another quantity. It is often used in mathematical or scientific contexts.

Examples:

The cost of the project is proportional to the size of the team.
The force required is proportional to the size of the object.
The energy consumption is proportional to the size of the building.
The speed of the car is proportional to the size of the engine.
The amount of paint needed is proportional to the size of the wall.

This phrase is used when discussing symbols or signs that are more probable or expected in a particular situation. It implies a higher likelihood of a specific symbol being chosen or used.

Examples:

In this context, the more likely symbol to be used is the check mark.
When predicting outcomes, the more likely symbol is often represented by a plus sign.
Based on historical data, the more likely symbol for success is the upward arrow.
In statistical analysis, the more likely symbol for correlation is the Greek letter rho.
When designing the logo, the more likely symbol to convey speed is a lightning bolt.

Answer 1

proportional to size of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a relationship between two quantities based on their sizes.

Answer 2

the more likely symbol

This phrase is correct and can be used to refer to a symbol that is more probable in a given context.

"proportional to size of" vs "the more likely symbol"

proportional to size of

the more likely symbol

Related Comparisons