"proportional to size of" vs "the more likely source symbol"

Question

"proportional to size of" vs "the more likely source symbol"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. 'Proportional to size of' is used to indicate a relationship between two quantities, while 'the more likely source symbol' is describing a specific symbol. Therefore, they serve different purposes and cannot be interchanged.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to express that one quantity changes in relation to the size of another quantity. It is often used in mathematical or scientific contexts.

Examples:

The cost of the project is proportional to the size of the team.
The force required is proportional to the size of the object.
The energy consumption is proportional to the size of the building.
The speed of the vehicle is proportional to the size of the engine.
The amount of paint needed is proportional to the size of the wall.

This phrase is used to describe a symbol that is considered to be the most probable source of a particular element or information.

Examples:

The more likely source symbol for this equation is the letter 'x'.
In the context of this code, the more likely source symbol is the function 'main'.
The more likely source symbol for the error is the faulty hardware.
Based on the evidence, the more likely source symbol of the leak is the damaged pipe.
The more likely source symbol of the issue seems to be the outdated software.

Answer 1

proportional to size of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a relationship between two quantities based on their sizes.

Answer 2

the more likely source symbol

This phrase is correct and can be used to refer to a symbol that is more probable to be the source of something.

"proportional to size of" vs "the more likely source symbol"

proportional to size of

the more likely source symbol

Related Comparisons