🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

to size of vs and is inverse proportional

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "To size of" is incorrect and should be replaced with "to the size of." On the other hand, "and is inversely proportional" is a correct phrase used to describe a relationship between two variables.

Last updated: March 15, 2024 • 691 views

to size of

This phrase is incorrect. It should be "to the size of."

The correct phrase is "to the size of," which is used to compare something to the extent or magnitude of a particular size.
  • LA woman's ovary swells to size of grapefruit after freezing eggs. Published July 07, 2015. FoxNews.com. Facebook0 Twitter0 livefyre12 Email Print. Rox661.jpg.
  • Fit to size of Text. In order to make a Rect Transform with a Text component on it fit the text content, add a Content Size Fitter component to the same Game ...
  • May 13, 2015 ... Timing key to size of UBS forex penalties. FT Reporters. Share. Print; Clip; Gift Article. Comments. The logo of UBS AG is displayed at the ...
  • Study Shows Bluefin Tuna Going Hungry Due to Size of Prey, not Abundance. June 23, 2015 College News. Maine coast Bluefin tuna are going hungry in a sea  ...

Alternatives:

  • to the size of

and is inverse proportional

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe a relationship where one variable decreases as the other variable increases.

"And is inversely proportional" is used to indicate that two variables have an inverse relationship, meaning when one variable increases, the other decreases.
  • Feb 13, 2012 ... ... the object and the observation plane, and is inverse proportional to the maximal illuminated dimension of the object parallel to the direction.
  • The probability that the correlation spreads distance r is proportional to (1 – q)r ≈ exp(–qr), and hence the correlation length is finite and is inverse proportional ...
  • and is inverse proportional to the maximal illuminated dimension of the object parallel to the direction. In addition, the shapes of the speckle of the rough objects ...
  • and is inverse-proportional to sample size N. The upper bound of the variance of ∇τ ̂J(ρ) is twice larger than that of ∇η ̂J(ρ). When T goes to infinity, (1 − γT ) ...

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!