"it was surprising that" vs "it was surprised to"

Question

"it was surprising that" vs "it was surprised to"

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings and usage. 'It was surprising that' is used to introduce a surprising fact or event, while 'It was surprised to' is used to express that something or someone was surprised by a particular situation or event.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to introduce a surprising fact or event. It is followed by a clause that describes the surprising situation.

Examples:

It was surprising that she didn't show up to the party.
It was surprising that he managed to finish the project so quickly.

Alternatives:

It was unexpected that
It was astonishing that
It was remarkable that
It was shocking that
It was incredible that

This phrase is used to express that something or someone was surprised by a particular situation or event. It is followed by the cause of the surprise.

Examples:

It was surprised to see her at the event.
The cat was surprised to find a mouse in the house.

Alternatives:

It was taken aback to
It was shocked to
It was astonished to
It was amazed to
It was startled to

Answer 1

it was surprising that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a surprising fact or event.

Answer 2

it was surprised to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express that something or someone was surprised by a particular situation or event.

"it was surprising that" vs "it was surprised to"

it was surprising that

it was surprised to

Related Comparisons