"it was possible to" vs "it was possible that"

Question

"it was possible to" vs "it was possible that"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'It was possible that' is used to introduce a possibility or a situation that could have happened in the past, while 'it was possible to' is used to indicate the ability or opportunity to do something.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to express the capability or opportunity to perform an action. It is often followed by a verb.

Examples:

It was possible to reach the summit before nightfall.
It was possible to fix the issue with a simple adjustment.
It was possible to book the tickets online.

Alternatives:

It was feasible to
It was achievable to
It was within the realm of possibility to

This phrase is used to express a potential situation or outcome that could have occurred in the past. It is often followed by a verb phrase or a clause.

Examples:

It was possible that he had already left when we arrived.
It was possible that she forgot about the meeting.
It was possible that the package got lost in the mail.

Alternatives:

It might have been that
There was a chance that
It could have been that

Answer 1

it was possible to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the ability or opportunity to do something.

Answer 2

it was possible that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a possibility or a situation that could have happened in the past.

"it was possible to" vs "it was possible that"

it was possible to

it was possible that

Related Comparisons