"it was dangerous to" vs "it was dangerous that"

Question

"it was dangerous to" vs "it was dangerous that"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'It was dangerous that' is used to introduce a clause explaining the danger, while 'It was dangerous to' is used to indicate the action that was risky. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is typically used to highlight the specific action or behavior that posed a risk or danger in a given situation.

Examples:

It was dangerous to drive so fast on the icy road.
It was dangerous to approach the wild animal without caution.
It was dangerous to leave the candles burning unattended.
It was dangerous to climb the mountain without proper equipment.
It was dangerous to swim in the rough sea.

This phrase is typically used to provide further information or explanation about the danger that existed in a particular situation.

Examples:

It was dangerous that he went hiking alone in the dark.
It was dangerous that she left the stove on while she was out.
It was dangerous that the road was covered in ice.
It was dangerous that the children were playing near the cliff.
It was dangerous that the dog was left unattended near the pool.

Answer 1

it was dangerous to

This phrase is correct and is used to indicate the action that was risky or unsafe.

Answer 2

it was dangerous that

This phrase is correct and is used to introduce a clause explaining the danger in a situation.

"it was dangerous to" vs "it was dangerous that"

it was dangerous to

it was dangerous that

Related Comparisons