"it was obvious that" vs "it was interesting that"

Question

"it was obvious that" vs "it was interesting that"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey different meanings. 'It was interesting that' is used to express curiosity or fascination about something, while 'it was obvious that' is used to indicate that something was clear or easily understood. The choice between the two depends on the intended meaning of the sentence.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to state that a fact or situation was evident or easily recognizable.

Examples:

It was obvious that she was upset from her body language.
It was obvious that they had put a lot of effort into the project.
It was obvious that he was lying about his whereabouts.
It was obvious that the company was struggling financially.
It was obvious that the answer was right in front of us.

Alternatives:

It was clear that
It was apparent that
It was evident that
It was plain that
It was manifest that

This phrase is used to introduce a statement or observation that the speaker found intriguing or captivating.

Examples:

It was interesting that she chose to study marine biology.
It was interesting that he had never traveled outside the country.
It was interesting that the experiment yielded unexpected results.
It was interesting that they decided to start a new business during a recession.
It was interesting that the book was based on a true story.

Alternatives:

I found it interesting that
It caught my interest that
What intrigued me was that
It was fascinating that
It piqued my curiosity that

Answer 1

it was obvious that

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate that something was clear or easily understood.

Answer 2

it was interesting that

This phrase is correct and commonly used to express curiosity or fascination about something.

"it was obvious that" vs "it was interesting that"

it was obvious that

it was interesting that

Related Comparisons