"have harmful consequences" vs "have harmful results"

Question

"have harmful consequences" vs "have harmful results"

Both phrases are correct and can be used interchangeably. They convey the idea that something has negative effects or outcomes. The choice between 'consequences' and 'results' depends on personal preference or the specific context in which they are used.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the negative impact or repercussions of a particular action, decision, or event.

Examples:

The new policy could have harmful consequences for the environment.
Ignoring climate change will have harmful consequences for future generations.

Alternatives:

have negative consequences
result in harm
lead to adverse effects
cause detrimental outcomes
bring about damaging repercussions

This phrase is used to describe the negative impact or outcomes of a particular action, decision, or event.

Examples:

The company's unethical practices had harmful results on its reputation.
The lack of proper planning can have harmful results on the project.

Alternatives:

have negative results
result in harm
lead to adverse effects
cause detrimental outcomes
bring about damaging repercussions

Answer 1

have harmful consequences

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something leads to negative effects or outcomes.

Answer 2

have harmful results

This phrase is also correct and can be used to convey the idea that something leads to negative effects or outcomes.

"have harmful consequences" vs "have harmful results"

have harmful consequences

have harmful results

Related Comparisons