"consequences for" vs "consequences to"

Question

"consequences for" vs "consequences to"

Both 'consequences for' and 'consequences to' are commonly used in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Consequences for' is used to indicate the impact or results that affect someone or something, while 'consequences to' is used to show the recipient of the consequences.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

Use 'consequences for' to indicate the impact or results that affect someone or something. It shows the relationship between an action and its effects on a person or thing.

Examples:

The consequences for failing to meet the deadline are severe.
What are the consequences for breaking the rules?
There are serious consequences for not wearing a seatbelt.
The consequences for his actions were unexpected.
She had to face the consequences for her decisions.

Alternatives:

implications for
ramifications for
results for
effects on
outcomes for

Use 'consequences to' to show the recipient of the consequences. It indicates who is affected by the results or impact of a particular action.

Examples:

The consequences to the company were devastating.
What are the consequences to the environment?
The consequences to the community were significant.
He never considered the consequences to his family.
The consequences to her health were severe.

Alternatives:

implications to
ramifications to
results to
effects on
outcomes to

Answer 1

consequences for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

consequences to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"consequences for" vs "consequences to"

consequences for

consequences to

Related Comparisons