"risks of" vs "risks to"

Question

"risks of" vs "risks to"

Both 'risks to' and 'risks of' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Risks to' is used when referring to the potential harm or danger that something poses to someone or something else. On the other hand, 'risks of' is used when discussing the potential negative outcomes or consequences associated with a particular action or situation.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used when discussing the potential negative outcomes or consequences associated with a particular action or situation. For example, 'The risks of smoking are well-documented.'

Examples:

She is aware of the risks of investing in the stock market.
The risks of traveling during a pandemic are high.

Alternatives:

dangers of
threats of
hazards of
perils of

This phrase is used when referring to the potential harm or danger that something poses to someone or something else. For example, 'The risks to public health are significant.'

Examples:

The risks to the environment are becoming more evident.
There are risks to consider before making a decision.

Alternatives:

dangers to
threats to
hazards to
perils to

Answer 1

risks of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

risks to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"risks of" vs "risks to"

risks of

risks to

Related Comparisons