"danger to" vs "dangerous for"

Question

"danger to" vs "dangerous for"

Both 'dangerous for' and 'danger to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Dangerous for' is used to indicate something that poses a risk or threat to a specific person or thing, while 'danger to' is used to indicate something that poses a risk or threat in a more general sense.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

Use 'danger to' when you want to indicate that something poses a risk or threat in a more general sense. For example, 'The storm is a danger to the entire region.'

Examples:

The wildfire poses a danger to the nearby homes.
The new policy is a danger to the company's reputation.
The slippery floor is a danger to everyone in the building.
The virus is a danger to public health.
The exposed wires are a danger to anyone nearby.

Alternatives:

threat to
risk to
hazard to
peril to
menace to

Use 'dangerous for' when you want to indicate that something poses a risk or threat to a specific person or thing. For example, 'The chemicals are dangerous for your health.'

Examples:

The situation is dangerous for children.
The icy roads are dangerous for driving.
The area is dangerous for tourists.
The food is dangerous for people with allergies.
The job is dangerous for inexperienced workers.

Alternatives:

harmful to
risky for
unsafe for
detrimental to
perilous for

Answer 1

danger to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

dangerous for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"danger to" vs "dangerous for"

danger to

dangerous for

Related Comparisons