"threats" vs "threats to"

Question

"threats" vs "threats to"

Both 'threats' and 'threats to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Threats' is used when referring to the actual dangers or warnings, while 'threats to' is used when specifying the target or recipient of the threats.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

Use 'threats' when referring to the actual dangers or warnings being made.

Examples:

The company received threats of legal action.
He made threats against his former employer.

Alternatives:

warnings
menaces
intimidations
perils
hazards

Use 'threats to' when specifying the target or recipient of the threats.

Examples:

There were threats to the president's life.
The email contained threats to reveal confidential information.

Alternatives:

dangers to
warnings to
menaces to
intimidations to
perils to

Answer 1

threats

This is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

threats to

This is correct and commonly used in English.

"threats" vs "threats to"

threats

threats to

Related Comparisons