"consequences of" vs "consequences for"

Question

"consequences of" vs "consequences for"

Both "consequences for" and "consequences of" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Consequences for" is used to indicate the impact on someone or something, while "consequences of" is used to show the result or outcome of a particular action or event.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

Use "consequences of" when you want to indicate the result or outcome of a particular action or event. For example, "The consequences of the decision were far-reaching."

Examples:

What are the consequences of climate change?
The consequences of his actions were severe.
She had to face the consequences of her choices.
The consequences of the pandemic are still being felt.
The consequences of the war were devastating.

Alternatives:

results of
outcomes of
impact of
ramifications of
repercussions of

Use "consequences for" when you want to talk about the impact on someone or something. For example, "The consequences for the company were severe after the scandal."

Examples:

What are the consequences for failing to meet the deadline?
There will be consequences for your actions.
The consequences for the environment are dire.
She faced the consequences for her reckless behavior.
The consequences for the economy are yet to be seen.

Alternatives:

impact on
results for
ramifications for
repercussions for
outcomes for

Answer 1

consequences of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

consequences for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"consequences of" vs "consequences for"

consequences of

consequences for

Related Comparisons