"consequence of" vs "consequence for"

Question

"consequence of" vs "consequence for"

Both "consequence of" and "consequence for" are correct and commonly used in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Consequence of" is used to indicate the result or effect of something, while "consequence for" is used to show the impact or importance of something on a person or situation.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

Use "consequence of" to show the result or effect of a particular action, event, or situation. For example, "The consequence of his actions was severe punishment."

Examples:

The consequence of the heavy rain was flooding in the area.
One consequence of the new law was increased taxes.
What are the consequences of not following the rules?
The consequences of the decision are still unknown.
She had to face the consequences of her choices.

Alternatives:

result of
effect of
outcome of
impact of

Use "consequence for" to indicate the impact or importance of a particular action, event, or situation on a person or situation. For example, "The consequence for breaking the rules was suspension."

Examples:

What are the consequences for not completing the project on time?
There will be consequences for your behavior.
The consequences for failing the exam are serious.
He faced severe consequences for his actions.
The consequences for the company's decision are yet to be seen.

Alternatives:

impact on
importance for
ramifications for
repercussions for

Answer 1

consequence of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the result or effect of something.

Answer 2

consequence for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to show the impact or importance of something on a person or situation.

"consequence of" vs "consequence for"

consequence of

consequence for

Related Comparisons