"consequence of" vs "consequence from"

Question

"consequence of" vs "consequence from"

Both "consequence of" and "consequence from" are commonly used in English, but "consequence of" is more widely accepted and preferred. Both phrases convey a cause-and-effect relationship, but "consequence of" is more idiomatic and natural.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

Use "consequence of" to indicate the result or effect of something. It is a standard and widely accepted phrase in English.

Examples:

One consequence of the pandemic is the increase in remote work.
The consequences of his actions were severe.
What are the consequences of climate change?
The consequences of the decision are still unknown.
The consequences of the experiment were unexpected.

Alternatives:

result of
effect of
outcome of

While "consequence from" is grammatically correct, it is less commonly used than "consequence of". It can still be used to convey a cause-and-effect relationship.

Examples:

The consequences from his actions were severe.
What are the consequences from this decision?
The consequences from the experiment were unexpected.

Alternatives:

resulting from
stemming from

Answer 1

consequence of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

consequence from

This phrase is correct but less common than "consequence of".

"consequence of" vs "consequence from"

consequence of

consequence from

Related Comparisons