"there is no evidence" vs "there are no evidences"

Question

"there is no evidence" vs "there are no evidences"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There is no evidence' is the more common and appropriate phrase to use when referring to the absence of evidence in a singular form. 'There are no evidences' is less common and generally not used in English, as 'evidence' is typically treated as an uncountable noun.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

'There is no evidence' is the appropriate phrase to use when stating that there is a lack of evidence in a singular form.

Examples:

There is no evidence to support his claim.
There is no evidence of foul play in the investigation.
There is no evidence that the suspect was at the scene of the crime.
There is no evidence to suggest otherwise.
There is no evidence to back up their theory.

Alternatives:

There is no proof
No evidence exists
No evidence can be found
There is no supporting evidence
There is no indication

'There are no evidences' is not a common phrase in English. It is more natural to use 'There is no evidence' when referring to the absence of evidence.

Alternatives:

There is no evidence

Answer 1

there is no evidence

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the absence of evidence in a singular form.

Answer 2

there are no evidences

This phrase is not commonly used in English. 'Evidence' is usually treated as an uncountable noun, so it is more appropriate to use 'There is no evidence' instead.

"there is no evidence" vs "there are no evidences"

there is no evidence

there are no evidences

Related Comparisons