"To accomodate" vs "To addapt"

Question

"To accomodate" vs "To addapt"

Both "to accommodate" and "to adapt" are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. "To accommodate" means to provide lodging or space for someone or something, while "to adapt" means to adjust to new conditions or circumstances. They are not interchangeable as they convey different meanings.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase means to provide lodging or space for someone or something. It is often used in the context of making arrangements or adjustments to meet someone's needs.

Examples:

The hotel can accommodate up to 200 guests.
The restaurant can accommodate large groups for events.
The venue can accommodate wheelchair users with ramps and elevators.

Alternatives:

to make room for
to provide for
to adjust for

This phrase means to adjust to new conditions or circumstances. It is often used in the context of changing or modifying behavior, actions, or responses to fit a new situation.

Examples:

She had to adapt quickly to the new work environment.
The company adapted its marketing strategy to target a younger audience.
Animals have evolved and adapted to survive in harsh environments.

Alternatives:

to adjust
to modify
to change

Answer 1

To accomodate

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

To addapt

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"To accomodate" vs "To addapt"

To accomodate

To addapt

Related Comparisons