TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

There were no significant difference vs There were no significant differences

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There were no significant difference' is used when referring to a single comparison or situation, while 'There were no significant differences' is used when referring to multiple comparisons or situations.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 7492 views

There were no significant difference

This phrase is correct when referring to a single comparison or situation.

This phrase is used when you are talking about a single comparison or situation where there was no significant difference observed.

Examples:

  • In the study, there were no significant difference in the test scores between the two groups.

Alternatives:

  • There was no significant difference

There were no significant differences

This phrase is correct when referring to multiple comparisons or situations.

This phrase is used when you are talking about multiple comparisons or situations where there were no significant differences observed.

Examples:

  • After analyzing the data, there were no significant differences in the outcomes of the various experiments.
  • Feb 27, 2020 ... There were no significant differences in prevalence by age group (Figure 1). Among men, the prevalence of obesity was 40.3% among those aged 20– ...
  • There were no significant differences between BPD and BPDDS with regards to age, sex, BMI, or morbidity. Median excess weight loss and BMI at 12, 24, ...
  • Aug 22, 2002 ... The benefit from radiation therapy was related to a significant reduction in local recurrence. There were no significant differences among the ...
  • There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of clinical success (p = 0.974), clinical failure (p = 0.291), or recurrence (p = 0.094).
  • There were no significant differences in the obstetric or neonatal outcomes among the 3 groups. The rate of transfers during labor with the system involving ...

Alternatives:

  • There were no significant differences

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!