Which one is correct?
"there was no significant difference in" or "there was no significant difference between"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

100% Human-Powered Editing!

there was no significant difference in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when comparing characteristics within a single group or entity.

Alternatives:

  • there was no significant variation in
  • there was no significant disparity in
  • there was no significant discrepancy in
  • there was no significant difference within

there was no significant difference between

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when comparing characteristics between two or more groups or entities.

Alternatives:

  • there was no significant variation between
  • there was no significant disparity between
  • there was no significant discrepancy between
  • there was no significant difference among
Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'There was no significant difference in' is used when comparing characteristics within a single group or entity, while 'There was no significant difference between' is used when comparing characteristics between two or more groups or entities.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!