"There was no significant difference" vs "There were no significant difference"

Question

"There was no significant difference" vs "There were no significant difference"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There were no significant differences' is used when referring to multiple differences, while 'There was no significant difference' is used when talking about a single difference. The choice between the two depends on whether you are discussing a singular or plural concept.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024

This phrase is used when discussing a single difference that was not significant.

Examples:

There was no significant difference in the test results.

Alternatives:

There was no significant variation
There was no significant discrepancy
There was no significant disparity
There was no significant distinction
There was no significant divergence

This phrase is used when discussing multiple differences that were not significant.

Examples:

In the study, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

Alternatives:

There were no significant variations
There were no significant discrepancies
There were no significant disparities
There were no significant distinctions
There were no significant divergences

Answer 1

There was no significant difference

This phrase is correct when referring to a single difference.

Answer 2

There were no significant difference

This phrase is correct when referring to multiple differences.

"There was no significant difference" vs "There were no significant difference"

There was no significant difference

There were no significant difference

Related Comparisons