"the redundancy caused by" vs "the redundancy resulting due to"

Question

"the redundancy caused by" vs "the redundancy resulting due to"

Both phrases are correct, but "the redundancy caused by" is more commonly used and considered more concise. Both phrases convey the idea that redundancy is the result of something. However, the first phrase is more straightforward and widely accepted in English.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something is the reason for the redundancy. It is a concise and clear way to express this relationship.

Alternatives:

the redundancy resulting from
the redundancy caused by
the redundancy due to

This phrase also conveys the idea that redundancy is the outcome of something. However, it may sound slightly less natural or concise compared to the alternative.

Alternatives:

the redundancy caused by
the redundancy resulting from
the redundancy due to

Answer 1

the redundancy caused by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

the redundancy resulting due to

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"the redundancy caused by" vs "the redundancy resulting due to"

the redundancy caused by

the redundancy resulting due to

Related Comparisons