"processes have been reported" vs "processes have been frequently reported"

Question

"processes have been reported" vs "processes have been frequently reported"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'Processes have been frequently reported' implies that the processes have been reported many times, while 'Processes have been reported' simply states that the processes have been reported at least once. The choice between the two depends on the emphasis the speaker wants to convey.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase simply states that the processes have been reported at least once, without specifying the frequency of the reports.

Examples:

The incidents involving the manufacturing processes have been reported to the management.
The findings of the study processes have been reported in the scientific journal.

Alternatives:

processes have been documented
processes have been recorded
processes have been noted

This phrase is used to indicate that the processes have been reported many times or on multiple occasions.

Examples:

The issues with the new software processes have been frequently reported by the users.
The safety violations have been frequently reported to the authorities.

Alternatives:

processes have been reported multiple times
processes have been reported on numerous occasions
processes have been frequently mentioned

Answer 1

processes have been reported

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

processes have been frequently reported

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"processes have been reported" vs "processes have been frequently reported"

processes have been reported

processes have been frequently reported

Related Comparisons