"for" vs "notorious for"

Question

"for" vs "notorious for"

The phrase 'notorious for' is correct and commonly used in English to indicate someone or something is well-known for something negative or undesirable. On the other hand, 'for' alone is too general and lacks the specific connotation of something being infamous or widely recognized for a particular reason.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

Avoid using 'for' alone when you want to convey the idea of being notorious or widely recognized for a particular reason.

Use 'notorious for' to indicate that someone or something is well-known for something negative or undesirable.

Examples:

He is notorious for his bad temper.
The company became notorious for its unethical practices.
She is notorious for always being late.
The city is notorious for its high crime rate.
The actor is notorious for his controversial statements.

Alternatives:

infamous for
known for
famous for
renowned for
recognized for

Answer 1

for

This phrase is too general and lacks the specific connotation of being well-known for something negative or undesirable.

Answer 2

notorious for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"for" vs "notorious for"

for

notorious for

Related Comparisons