"dangerous to" vs "dangerous for"

Question

"dangerous to" vs "dangerous for"

Both 'dangerous for' and 'dangerous to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Dangerous for' is used to indicate something that poses a risk or threat to a particular person or thing. On the other hand, 'dangerous to' is used to show that something is a threat or risk to someone or something else.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

Use 'dangerous to' when you want to indicate that something is a threat or risk to someone or something else. For example, 'The wild animals are dangerous to hikers.'

Examples:

The broken glass is dangerous to bare feet.
The extreme heat is dangerous to pets.
The flooded river is dangerous to swimmers.
The sharp objects are dangerous to children.
The unstable structure is dangerous to anyone nearby.

Alternatives:

a threat to
a risk to
hazardous to
unsafe for
perilous to

Use 'dangerous for' when you want to indicate that something poses a risk or threat to a particular person or thing. For example, 'The icy roads are dangerous for drivers.'

Examples:

The chemicals are dangerous for the environment.
The situation is dangerous for our health.
The steep cliffs are dangerous for climbers.
The storm is dangerous for small boats.
The lack of safety measures is dangerous for workers.

Alternatives:

harmful to
risky for
unsafe for
perilous for
detrimental to

Answer 1

dangerous to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

dangerous for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"dangerous to" vs "dangerous for"

dangerous to

dangerous for

Related Comparisons