Which one is correct?
"it was reviewed by" or "was already reviewed by"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"it was reviewed by" or "was already reviewed by"?

This phrase is used to indicate that something underwent a review process by a specific person or group.

Examples:

The report was reviewed by the committee.
The manuscript was reviewed by the editor.
The proposal was reviewed by the board of directors.

Alternatives:

it was examined by
it was assessed by
it was scrutinized by
it was evaluated by
it was inspected by

This phrase is used to indicate that something has already undergone a review process before a specific point in time.

Examples:

The document was already reviewed by the team last week.
The application was already reviewed by the admissions committee.
The design was already reviewed by the client before the meeting.

Alternatives:

had already been reviewed by
had previously been reviewed by
had already undergone review by
had already been assessed by
had already been scrutinized by

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'It was reviewed by' is used when referring to a specific instance of review, while 'was already reviewed by' implies that the reviewing process has already taken place before a certain point in time.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.