"it is reviewed by" vs "already reviewed by"

Question

"it is reviewed by" vs "already reviewed by"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'It is reviewed by' is used to indicate the passive voice, where the subject receives the action of being reviewed. On the other hand, 'already reviewed by' implies that the reviewing process has already taken place. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on whether you want to emphasize the ongoing nature of the review or the completion of the review.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something is being reviewed by someone or a group of people. It is in the passive voice, where the subject is the one being reviewed.

Examples:

The report is reviewed by the committee.
The manuscript is reviewed by experts before publication.

Alternatives:

It is being reviewed by
It was reviewed by

This phrase is used to indicate that something has already undergone a review process. It implies that the review has been completed.

Examples:

The document is already reviewed by the supervisor.
The application is already reviewed by the admissions committee.

Alternatives:

previously reviewed by
previously examined by

Answer 1

it is reviewed by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the passive voice.

Answer 2

already reviewed by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that the reviewing process has already been completed.

"it is reviewed by" vs "already reviewed by"

it is reviewed by

already reviewed by

Related Comparisons