"It proved to" vs "It was proved to"

Question

"It proved to" vs "It was proved to"

Both "it was proved to" and "it proved to" are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "It was proved to" is passive voice and is used when emphasizing the action of proving, while "it proved to" is active voice and is used when focusing on the subject proving something.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used in active voice to emphasize the subject proving something. It is often followed by the result or outcome of the proof.

Examples:

The new method proved to be more efficient than the old one.
The experiment proved to be successful.
The data proved to support the hypothesis.

Alternatives:

it demonstrated that
it showed that
it confirmed that
it established that
it revealed that

This phrase is used in passive voice to emphasize the action of proving something. It is often followed by the result or outcome of the proof.

Examples:

It was proved to be the most effective treatment for the disease.
The theory was proved to be incorrect after further research.
The evidence was proved to be insufficient for a conviction.

Alternatives:

it was shown to
it was demonstrated to
it was confirmed to
it was established that
it was revealed that

Answer 1

It proved to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in active voice.

Answer 2

It was proved to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in formal contexts.

"It proved to" vs "It was proved to"

It proved to

It was proved to

Related Comparisons