"it was not a coincidence that" vs "it was not coincident that"

Question

"it was not a coincidence that" vs "it was not coincident that"

The phrase 'it was not a coincidence that' is correct and commonly used in English, while 'it was not coincident that' is not a standard construction in English. 'Coincidence' is the correct term to express the idea of something happening by chance or simultaneously. Therefore, 'it was not a coincidence that' is the appropriate choice in this context.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something was not a chance event or a random occurrence.

Examples:

It was not a coincidence that they both arrived at the same time.
It was not a coincidence that she chose the same dress as her friend.
It was not a coincidence that the two companies announced their merger simultaneously.
It was not a coincidence that they both had the same idea at the same time.
It was not a coincidence that the two events happened on the same day.

Alternatives:

it was not a coincidence that

Answer 1

it was not a coincidence that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

it was not coincident that

This phrase is not a standard construction in English.

"it was not a coincidence that" vs "it was not coincident that"

it was not a coincidence that

it was not coincident that

Related Comparisons