"it was not a coincidence" vs "it was not coincident"

Question

"it was not a coincidence" vs "it was not coincident"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'It was not a coincidence' is the more common and natural way to express that something was not accidental. On the other hand, 'it was not coincident' is less common and may sound a bit formal or awkward in everyday conversation.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to convey that an event or situation was not a result of chance or luck, but rather had a specific cause or reason.

Examples:

It was not a coincidence that they both arrived at the same time.
It was not a coincidence that they chose the same restaurant for lunch.
It was not a coincidence that they both got the job offer on the same day.
It was not a coincidence that they both wore the same color to the party.
It was not a coincidence that they both had the same idea at the meeting.

Alternatives:

It was not by chance
It was not accidental
It was not random
It was not a fluke
It was not happenstance

This phrase can be used to convey that two things or events did not occur at the same time or were not simultaneous.

Alternatives:

It was not simultaneous
It was not concurrent
It was not concomitant
It was not synchronized
It was not parallel

Answer 1

it was not a coincidence

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express that something was not accidental.

Answer 2

it was not coincident

This phrase is correct but less common in everyday English. It may sound more formal or awkward compared to 'it was not a coincidence'.

"it was not a coincidence" vs "it was not coincident"

it was not a coincidence

it was not coincident

Related Comparisons