Which one is correct?
"is reserved for" or "is reserved to"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"is reserved for" or "is reserved to"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used to indicate that something is set aside for a specific purpose or person.

Examples:

This table is reserved for special guests.
The first row of seats is reserved for VIPs.
The parking space is reserved for employees only.
The scholarship is reserved for students with exceptional academic performance.
The front row seats are reserved for the family members.

Alternatives:

is set aside for
is designated for
is allocated for
is earmarked for
is saved for

This phrase is used to indicate that something belongs exclusively to a particular person or group.

Examples:

The power to declare war is reserved to Congress.
The right to vote is reserved to citizens of the country.
The decision is reserved to the board of directors.
The authority to make changes is reserved to the management team.
The privilege of entry is reserved to members only.

Alternatives:

is exclusive to
is limited to
is confined to
is restricted to
is assigned to

Both "is reserved for" and "is reserved to" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Is reserved for" is commonly used to indicate that something is set aside for a specific purpose or person. On the other hand, "is reserved to" is less common and is typically used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that something belongs exclusively to a particular person or group.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024