Which one is correct?
"full of dust" or "very polluted"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"full of dust" or "very polluted"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used to describe a place or object that has a significant amount of dust covering it. It indicates a high level of dust accumulation.

Examples:

The old attic was full of dust and cobwebs.
After the construction work, the room was full of dust.
The neglected bookshelf was full of dust.
The abandoned warehouse was full of dust particles.
The car's interior was full of dust after sitting unused for months.

Alternatives:

covered in dust
dusty
dust-covered
dust-laden
dust-filled

This phrase is used to describe a place or the air that has been contaminated with harmful substances, making it unsafe or unhealthy for living beings.

Examples:

The river was very polluted due to industrial waste.
The city air was very polluted with smog.
The beach was very polluted with plastic debris.
The lake was very polluted with chemicals.
The atmosphere in the factory was very polluted with fumes.

Alternatives:

highly contaminated
severely polluted
heavily polluted
extremely contaminated
dangerously polluted

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'Full of dust' implies that something is covered or filled with dust, while 'very polluted' suggests that the air or environment is contaminated with harmful substances. The choice between the two depends on the specific context and the intended meaning.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024