"covered by" vs "covered under"

Question

"covered by" vs "covered under"

Both 'covered under' and 'covered by' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'Covered under' is commonly used when referring to being protected or included within a policy, law, or agreement. On the other hand, 'covered by' is used when indicating the entity responsible for providing coverage or protection.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

The phrase 'covered by' is used to indicate the entity responsible for providing coverage or protection. For example, 'The medical expenses are covered by the insurance company.'

Examples:

The repairs are covered by the warranty.
The event is covered by the liability insurance.
The costs are covered by the government grant.
The damages are covered by the landlord.
The expenses are covered by the company policy.

Alternatives:

provided by
insured by
protected by
guaranteed by
underwritten by

The phrase 'covered under' is used to indicate that something is protected or included within a policy, law, or agreement. For example, 'This situation is covered under the insurance policy.'

Examples:

The specific conditions are covered under the terms of the contract.
The rights of the employees are covered under the labor laws.
The warranty covers defects that are covered under the manufacturer's policy.
The damage caused by the storm is covered under the homeowner's insurance.
The treatment is covered under the healthcare plan.

Alternatives:

included in
protected by
subject to
governed by
specified in

Answer 1

covered by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when indicating the entity responsible for providing coverage or protection.

Answer 2

covered under

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to being protected or included within a policy, law, or agreement.

"covered by" vs "covered under"

covered by

covered under

Related Comparisons