"build dependency graphs" vs "design dependency graphs"

Question

"build dependency graphs" vs "design dependency graphs"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Build dependency graphs' is commonly used when referring to the process of creating or constructing dependency graphs, while 'design dependency graphs' is more appropriate when focusing on the planning and conceptualization of the graphs.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used when talking about the action of physically constructing dependency graphs, typically in the context of software development or project management.

Examples:

The team will need to build dependency graphs to understand the relationships between different modules.
Developers use tools to automatically build dependency graphs for their codebase.

Alternatives:

create dependency graphs
generate dependency graphs
construct dependency graphs
assemble dependency graphs
form dependency graphs

This phrase is used when emphasizing the process of planning and conceptualizing dependency graphs, typically in the context of system architecture or data modeling.

Examples:

The architect will design dependency graphs to illustrate the relationships between components.
Before implementation, it's important to carefully design dependency graphs.

Alternatives:

plan dependency graphs
conceptualize dependency graphs
sketch dependency graphs
outline dependency graphs
map out dependency graphs

Answer 1

build dependency graphs

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the process of creating or constructing dependency graphs.

Answer 2

design dependency graphs

This phrase is correct and commonly used when focusing on the planning and conceptualization of dependency graphs.

"build dependency graphs" vs "design dependency graphs"

build dependency graphs

design dependency graphs

Related Comparisons