"assigned to" vs "assigned for"

Question

"assigned to" vs "assigned for"

Both 'assigned to' and 'assigned for' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Assigned to' is used to indicate the person or thing to which something is given or allocated, while 'assigned for' is used to indicate the purpose or reason for which something is given or allocated.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

You can use 'assigned to' when specifying who or what is receiving an assignment, task, or responsibility.

Examples:

The project was assigned to the new team member.
The homework was assigned to the students.
The task was assigned to the most experienced employee.

Alternatives:

allocated to
given to
designated for

You can use 'assigned for' when specifying the purpose or reason for assigning something.

Examples:

This budget is assigned for marketing expenses.
The room was assigned for the meeting.
The funds were assigned for research purposes.

Alternatives:

designated for
intended for
allocated for

Answer 1

assigned to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the person or thing to which something is given or allocated.

Answer 2

assigned for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the purpose or reason for which something is given or allocated.

"assigned to" vs "assigned for"

assigned to

assigned for

Related Comparisons