"roles assigned to" vs "roles assigned for"

Question

"roles assigned to" vs "roles assigned for"

Both 'roles assigned to' and 'roles assigned for' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Roles assigned to' is used when specifying the recipients of the roles, while 'roles assigned for' is used when indicating the purpose or reason for the assignment of roles.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used to specify the recipients of the roles that have been assigned. It indicates who has been given the roles.

Examples:

The roles assigned to the new team members were clearly defined.
Different responsibilities were assigned to each team member.

Alternatives:

roles given to
roles designated for
roles allocated to
roles distributed to
roles appointed to

This phrase is used to indicate the purpose or reason for the assignment of roles. It specifies why the roles were given or allocated.

Examples:

The roles assigned for the project were based on each team member's expertise.
Roles were assigned for the smooth functioning of the organization.

Alternatives:

roles designated for
roles intended for
roles meant for
roles allocated for
roles reserved for

Answer 1

roles assigned to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

roles assigned for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"roles assigned to" vs "roles assigned for"

roles assigned to

roles assigned for

Related Comparisons