"good knowledge" vs "deep knowledge"

Question

"good knowledge" vs "deep knowledge"

Both 'deep knowledge' and 'good knowledge' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Deep knowledge' implies a thorough and comprehensive understanding of a subject, while 'good knowledge' suggests a solid or satisfactory level of understanding. The choice between the two depends on the depth of understanding you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

Use 'good knowledge' when you want to convey that someone has a decent understanding of a topic, but not necessarily an expert level.

Examples:

He has a good knowledge of computer programming.
She possesses good knowledge of French cuisine.
A good knowledge of mathematics is essential for this job.

Alternatives:

solid knowledge
satisfactory knowledge
adequate knowledge
sufficient knowledge
reasonable knowledge

Use 'deep knowledge' when you want to emphasize a high level of understanding or expertise in a particular area.

Examples:

She has deep knowledge of ancient history.
His deep knowledge of physics impressed the panel.
The professor's deep knowledge of literature is evident in her lectures.

Alternatives:

profound knowledge
extensive knowledge
in-depth knowledge
comprehensive knowledge
thorough knowledge

Answer 1

good knowledge

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a solid or satisfactory level of understanding of a subject.

Answer 2

deep knowledge

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a thorough and comprehensive understanding of a subject.

"good knowledge" vs "deep knowledge"

good knowledge

deep knowledge

Related Comparisons