"practical" vs "hands-on"

Question

"practical" vs "hands-on"

Both 'hands-on' and 'practical' are correct phrases, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Hands-on' is often used to describe learning or experience that involves actively doing something, while 'practical' is more general and can refer to something that is useful, realistic, or likely to be successful.

Last Updated: April 03, 2024

'Practical' is a versatile term that can be used to describe something that is sensible, feasible, or suitable for a particular purpose.

Examples:

The course provides practical skills for the workplace.
She has a practical approach to problem-solving.
It's important to consider the practical implications of the decision.
The design is both stylish and practical.
He is known for his practical advice.

Alternatives:

useful
realistic
feasible
sensible
effective

'Hands-on' is used to describe a learning or practical experience that involves actively doing something, rather than just observing or reading about it.

Examples:

The workshop offers a hands-on approach to learning new skills.
Students benefit from hands-on experience in the lab.
I prefer a hands-on training session to online tutorials.
The museum provides hands-on activities for children.
The internship offers valuable hands-on experience in the field.

Alternatives:

interactive
practical
experiential
applied
active

Answer 1

practical

The word 'practical' is correct and commonly used in English to describe something that is useful, realistic, or likely to be successful.

Answer 2

hands-on

The phrase 'hands-on' is correct and commonly used in English, especially in the context of learning or experience that involves active participation.