"low quality" vs "low-quality"

Question

"low quality" vs "low-quality"

Both "low quality" and "low-quality" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Low quality" is used when describing something that has poor quality, while "low-quality" is used as a compound adjective before a noun.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

Use "low quality" when describing something that has poor quality. It is typically used after a linking verb like "is" or "seems."

Examples:

The product is of low quality.
The service provided was of low quality.
She was disappointed by the low quality of the food.
The low quality of the materials used was evident.
The company is known for its low quality products.

Alternatives:

poor quality
inferior quality
substandard quality
lackluster quality
unsatisfactory quality

Use "low-quality" as a compound adjective before a noun to describe something that has poor quality.

Examples:

He bought a low-quality product.
The low-quality service was not worth the price.
She refused to use the low-quality materials provided.
The company is known for its low-quality products.
The low-quality workmanship was evident in the final product.

Alternatives:

poor-quality
inferior-quality
substandard-quality
lackluster-quality
unsatisfactory-quality

Answer 1

low quality

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when describing something that has poor quality.

Answer 2

low-quality

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English as a compound adjective before a noun.

"low quality" vs "low-quality"

low quality

low-quality

Related Comparisons