"interference with" vs "interference in"

Question

"interference with" vs "interference in"

Both 'interference with' and 'interference in' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Interference with' is used when referring to disrupting or obstructing something, while 'interference in' is used when talking about involvement in a situation or affair.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to disrupting or obstructing something. For example, 'The noise from the construction site caused interference with the recording.'

Examples:

The interference with the radio signal was due to the nearby power lines.
She was accused of interference with the investigation.

Alternatives:

disruption of
obstruction of
hindrance to
interruption of
tampering with

This phrase is used when talking about involvement in a situation or affair. For example, 'The country denied any interference in the election process.'

Examples:

There was evidence of foreign interference in the domestic affairs of the country.
He was accused of interference in the company's decision-making process.

Alternatives:

involvement in
meddling in
intervention in
intrusion in
participation in

Answer 1

interference with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

interference in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"interference with" vs "interference in"

interference with

interference in

Related Comparisons